Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 5, 2022

Shapiro v. Adams

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:22-cv-02603
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Shapiro v. Adams, Judge Failla dismissed claims against three city agencies, added New York City, and ordered summonses for the City and Mayor Adams.

Who this affects

Norman Shapiro’s claims against the New York City Police Department, the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, and the Office of Labor Relations were dismissed. The City of New York was added as a defendant, and summonses were ordered for the City and Mayor Eric Adams; the opinion did not resolve the underlying First Amendment claim.

What happened

Norman Shapiro, representing himself, sued Mayor Eric Adams and three New York City agencies, alleging that the City’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for City workers violated the First Amendment. The opinion does not decide whether the mandate violated his rights.

The court ruled that the New York City Police Department, the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, and the Office of Labor Relations could not be sued as separate City agencies. It treated Shapiro’s complaint as also asserting claims against the City of New York, replaced the agencies with the City in the case caption, and directed that summonses be issued for the City and Mayor Adams.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla dismissed Shapiro’s claims against the three agencies, added the City of New York as a defendant, and directed the Clerk to issue summonses for the City and Mayor Adams. Shapiro must serve those defendants within 90 days after the summonses are issued or request more time, or the court may dismiss the claims for failure to pursue the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shapiro v. Adams · No. 1:22-cv-02603
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Apr. 5, 2022

Background

Norman Shapiro filed this pro se action after paying the filing fee. He alleged that Defendants violated his First Amendment rights by requiring him, as a New York City employee, to comply with the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for City workers. He named Mayor Eric Adams, the New York City Police Department, the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, and the Office of Labor Relations.

Shapiro told the court that he had not properly served the Defendants and needed new summonses. He also asked whether he could withdraw the action and refile it without losing or paying the filing fee again. The court stated that withdrawing the action would not result in a refund of the filing fee.

Agency Defendants

The court held that the New York City Police Department, the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, and the Office of Labor Relations could not be sued as separate entities because City agencies generally are not suable under the New York City Charter. The court therefore dismissed Shapiro’s claims against those three agencies.

Because Shapiro was representing himself and clearly intended to assert claims against New York City, the court construed the complaint as asserting claims against the City. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, it directed the Clerk of Court to amend the case caption by replacing the three agencies with the City of New York. The court stated that this amendment was without prejudice to any defenses the City might assert.

Service of Process and Disposition

The court directed the Clerk to issue summonses for the City of New York and Mayor Eric Adams. Shapiro must serve the summons and complaint on each Defendant within 90 days after the summonses are issued. If he does not serve them or request an extension within that period, the court may dismiss the claims under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla ordered the dismissal of the claims against the New York City Police Department, the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, and the Office of Labor Relations. She also directed the Clerk to add the City of New York as a Defendant, correct the spelling of Mayor Adams’s name on the docket, issue summonses for the City and Mayor Adams, and mail Shapiro a copy of the order. The opinion did not decide the merits of Shapiro’s First Amendment challenge to the vaccine mandate.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.