Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 6, 2022

Ortega v. Thras.io, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-01795
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Ortega v. Thras.io, Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by May 6, 2022.

Who this affects

Juan Ortega, the other similarly situated persons he sought to represent, and Thras.io, Inc.; the case's deadlines were also postponed indefinitely.

What happened

In Ortega v. Thras.io, Inc., the court received a letter from Juan Ortega stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if an application was made by May 6, 2022. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would become with prejudice.

Judge Vyskocil also postponed all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ortega v. Thras.io, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-01795
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 6, 2022

Background

Juan Ortega brought the case individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. The court received Ortega's letter stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Ruling

The court ordered that the case be discontinued without costs to any party. The order allowed either side to seek restoration of the case to the court's calendar by May 6, 2022. If no application to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored. The court also postponed all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.

Effect of the Order

The order ended the case subject to the stated May 6, 2022 restoration period. The opinion does not provide the settlement's terms or state whether the court approved the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.