Capital Markets Placement Inc. v. Neuvoo Inc.
- Gregory Woods
- 1:21-cv-06845
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 10
In Capital Markets Placement v. Neuvoo, Judge Woods approved a stipulated protective order governing confidential discovery materials in the case.
The parties, their officers, agents, employees, attorneys, litigation vendors, witnesses, experts, mediators, arbitrators, the court, and other persons subject to or notified of the protective order are affected. Recipients of protected material must follow its disclosure, use, security, and return-or-destruction requirements.
What happened
Capital Markets Placement, Inc. sued Neuvoo, Inc. and Talent.com, Inc. in the Southern District of New York. The parties, through their lawyers, asked the court to protect nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that might be exchanged during discovery.
The order establishes two levels of protection: “Confidential” and “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” It limits who may receive protected information, requires nondisclosure agreements for certain recipients, and restricts use of the information to this case and related appeals.
The court found good cause and entered the stipulated protective order. The order also sets procedures for challenging confidentiality designations, filing protected material with the court, returning or destroying protected material after the case ends, and enforcing the order. Judge Woods signed the order on April 7, 2022.
The detailed version
- Capital Markets Placement Inc. v. Neuvoo Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-06845
- Gregory Woods
- Apr. 7, 2022
Background
The parties jointly requested a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). They sought protection for nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that could be disclosed during discovery. The court found good cause for an appropriately tailored order governing the pretrial phase of the case.
Terms of the Order
The order covers discovery materials designated as either “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Information may be designated confidential if the producing person reasonably and in good faith believes it includes previously undisclosed financial information, nonpublic ownership or control information, competitively sensitive business information, personal or intimate information, or another category the court later approves.
The more restrictive “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only” designation is available when disclosure to another party or nonparty would create a substantial risk of serious harm that less restrictive protections could not avoid. The order contains procedures for marking documents and deposition testimony, making later designations, and designating materials produced by nonparties.
Who May Receive Protected Information
Confidential information may be disclosed to specified recipients, including the parties, their insurers and insurance counsel, outside counsel and their litigation staff, vendors working on the case, mediators or arbitrators, certain authors or recipients of documents, potential witnesses, experts, and the court. Many recipients must first receive the order and sign a nondisclosure agreement.
Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only information may be disclosed to a narrower group, including litigation counsel and in-house counsel, certain litigation-support personnel, experts, consultants, vendors, witnesses, people who previously had access to the information, other people approved by the parties or court, and the court. Witnesses generally may be shown only the information counsel believes in good faith is necessary for testimony, and may not receive copies outside an actual proceeding.
Challenges, Court Filings, and Use
The order does not waive objections to discovery, waive privilege or other protections, or decide whether evidence is admissible at trial. It also does not make a final finding that designated material is actually confidential. The court retains discretion over whether to give confidential treatment to any material and states that it may be unlikely to seal material introduced at trial.
A party challenging a confidentiality designation may give written notice before trial. If the parties cannot promptly resolve the dispute, they must bring it to the court under the court’s individual practices. Protected material filed with the court generally requires a public redacted filing, an unredacted filing under seal, and a particularized application and supporting declaration justifying sealing.
Recipients may use protected material only to prosecute or defend this case and related appeals. The order addresses disclosures required by subpoenas or other legal process, requires precautions against unauthorized disclosure, and generally requires return or destruction of protected material within 60 days after final disposition, including appeals. The order survives termination of the litigation, and the court retains jurisdiction to enforce it and impose contempt sanctions. Judge Woods ordered the parties and other persons covered by the order to comply with these terms.
Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.