Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 8, 2022

Barone v. Campania Felix LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:20-cv-06709
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Barone v. Campania Felix LLC, Judge Vyskocil approved a fair settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the settled case. The opinion does not provide enough information to identify the settlement’s specific terms or all people covered by it.

What happened

In Barone v. Campania Felix LLC, the plaintiffs told the court that the case had been settled and submitted documents supporting the settlement’s fairness.

The court reviewed the settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Second Circuit law. It found the settlement terms fair and reasonable, but did not express an opinion about whether the plaintiff’s attorney’s billing rates were reasonable.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil approved the settlement and ordered the case dismissed with prejudice. The court also directed the clerk to terminate pending motions, adjourn remaining dates, and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Barone v. Campania Felix LLC · No. 1:20-cv-06709
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 8, 2022

Background

The plaintiffs informed the court that the case had been settled. They submitted a letter and supporting documents concerning the settlement’s fairness. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or other specific terms.

Court’s Review

The court reviewed the settlement for fairness under the Fair Labor Standards Act and applicable Second Circuit law. The court concluded that the settlement terms were fair and reasonable. It specifically stated that its approval did not express an opinion about the reasonableness of the rates charged by the attorney representing the plaintiff.

Ruling and Case Status

The court approved the settlement and ordered that the case be dismissed with prejudice. It also directed the clerk to terminate all pending motions, adjourn any remaining dates, and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.