Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 11, 2022

Falberg v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:19-cv-09910
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Falberg v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Judge Ramos granted defendants’ request to file sensitive class-member and severance documents under seal or in redacted form.

Who this affects

The order affects the defendants’ ability to file specified documents under seal or in redacted form, and it limits public access to information concerning absent class members and Goldman Sachs’s separation agreements.

What happened

Falberg v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. involved defendants’ request to file certain documents under seal or in redacted form while seeking to exclude some class members and compel arbitration.

The documents included information about absent class members, such as names, employment history, and severance payments, along with confidential terms of separation agreements. The plaintiff took no position on the request.

The court granted the application. The order was entered by Judge Edgardo Ramos on April 11, 2022, allowing the specified documents to be filed under seal or in redacted form.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Falberg v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-09910
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Apr. 11, 2022

Background

Leonid Falberg brought the action as a representative of a class of similarly situated people and on behalf of The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan. The defendants were The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan Retirement Committee, and John Does 1-20.

The defendants asked for permission to file certain exhibits, an appendix, and an unredacted declaration under seal or in redacted form. They said the documents supported their motion to exclude certain class members from the class and require those individuals to arbitrate. The documents had been designated confidential under a protective order.

Arguments concerning sealing

The filing discussed the public’s presumptive right to inspect judicial records but also noted that documents used only in discovery may fall outside that presumption. The defendants argued that the documents contained identifying information about absent class members, including names, employment history, and the economic terms of severance payments. They also argued that the separation agreements contained confidential commercial information about Goldman Sachs’s separation arrangements.

The defendants relied on the privacy interests of former Goldman Sachs employees and on the claimed sensitivity of the separation agreements. They also stated that the court had previously allowed similar material to be filed under seal. The plaintiff took no position on the motion.

Ruling

The court’s order marked the application as granted. It therefore allowed the defendants to file the specified documents under seal or in redacted form in connection with their motion concerning class members and arbitration. Judge Edgardo Ramos signed the order, dated April 11, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.