Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 15, 2022

Polanco v. Porter

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:21-cv-10927
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Polanco v. Porter, Judge Vyskocil granted defendants’ request to seal the case’s Individuals with Disabilities Education Act record.

Who this affects

The minor student identified as A.D., whose identifying, educational, and medical information is contained in the administrative record, and members of the public seeking access to that record.

What happened

Polanco et al. v. Porter et al. is an action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act involving a minor student identified as A.D. The defendants asked to file the certified administrative record under seal.

The defendants, with the consent of the plaintiff’s counsel, said the record contained A.D.’s identifying information, medical history, disabilities, educational records, and hearing materials. They argued that protecting A.D.’s privacy outweighed the public’s interest in access to the record.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil granted the request. The order therefore allowed the certified administrative record to be filed under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Polanco v. Porter · No. 1:21-cv-10927
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 15, 2022

Background

The action was brought under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) on behalf of a minor student identified as A.D. The defendants sought permission to file the certified administrative record under seal. The record included transcripts from hearings before the Impartial Hearing Office and State Review Office, exhibits, educational records, and medical records.

Request to Seal

The defendants argued that the record contained confidential information, including A.D.’s name, date of birth, other identifying information, medical history, disabilities, educational progress, and educational history. They cited federal court filing rules, the IDEA, and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. They also argued that the underlying administrative proceeding was presumptively closed to the public.

The defendants relied on the standard for sealing judicial documents, including the privacy interests of people opposing disclosure. They argued that protecting A.D.’s privacy was a compelling reason that outweighed the public’s interest in accessing the record. The request was made with the consent of the plaintiff’s counsel.

Ruling

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil granted the request. The order allowed the certified administrative record to be filed under seal. The opinion does not decide the underlying IDEA dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.