Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 19, 2022

Bodziony v. Wolfgang's Steakhouse Inc.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:20-cv-08016
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Bodziony v. Wolfgang’s Steakhouse, Judge Liman required fairness materials and scheduled a hearing before deciding whether to approve the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the Fair Labor Standards Act case, their counsel regarding any proposed fee award, and the court’s remaining proceedings.

What happened

In Bodziony v. Wolfgang’s Steakhouse Inc., the parties told the court they had reached a settlement in principle in a case brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law.

The court ordered the parties to submit a joint letter explaining why the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable. The letter must address any confidentiality, non-disparagement, or release terms and provide supporting records for any requested attorneys’ fees. The court scheduled a telephone settlement-approval hearing for May 31, 2022, and dismissed any pending motions as moot while canceling other conferences and deadlines.

Judge Lewis J. Liman did not approve the settlement in this order. He required the parties to provide the requested information and appear at the hearing; plaintiffs were directed to appear, with an interpreter if necessary.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bodziony v. Wolfgang's Steakhouse Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-08016
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Apr. 19, 2022

Background

The parties reported that they had reached a settlement in principle. The case was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing wages and working conditions.

Court’s analysis and order

Under Second Circuit law, the court must review an Fair Labor Standards Act settlement—including any proposed award of attorneys’ fees—to determine whether it is fair. The court ordered the parties to submit a joint letter by May 25, 2022, explaining the basis for the proposed settlement and why it should be approved as fair and reasonable. The parties were directed to discuss the fairness factors identified in Wolinsky v. Scholastic, Inc.

The letter must address any confidentiality provisions, non-disparagement provisions, and releases in the proposed settlement agreement. If the settlement includes an attorneys’ fee award, the parties must also address that award and provide supporting documentation when appropriate. The court stated that merely identifying the requested fee as a proportion of the total settlement is insufficient. Fee requests should normally include contemporaneous time records identifying, for each attorney, the date, hours worked, and nature of the work. Insufficient documentation could result in rejection of the proposed fee award.

The court directed the parties to appear by telephone for a settlement-approval hearing on May 31, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. Plaintiffs were directed to appear and, if necessary, to use an interpreter. The order also states that any pending motions were dismissed as moot and that all other conferences and deadlines were canceled.

Disposition

Judge Lewis J. Liman did not approve or reject the settlement in this order. Instead, he ordered additional submissions and scheduled a settlement-approval hearing. Any pending motions were dismissed as moot.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.