Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.OtherFiled Apr. 19, 2022

Cerveceria Modelo de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. v. CB Brand Strategies, LLC

Judge
Lewis Kaplan
Docket
1:21-cv-01317
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Cerveceria Modelo de México v. CB Brand Strategies, Judge Kaplan received defendants’ request to seal parts of a reconsideration memorandum; the text shows no ruling.

Who this affects

The defendants seeking to seal portions of their reconsideration memorandum, the plaintiffs who designated the expert report as highly confidential, and members of the public who might otherwise view the filing.

What happened

Cerveceria Modelo de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. v. CB Brand Strategies, LLC concerns defendants’ request to keep certain information from the public in a court filing. The provided document is a letter addressed to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, not a decision resolving the request.

Defendants CB Brand Strategies, LLC, Crown Imports LLC, and Compania Cervecera de Coahuila, S. de R.L. de C.V. asked for permission to file under seal parts of their memorandum supporting a motion for reconsideration. They said the memorandum referred to confidential business information, including aspects of their products’ brewing processes. They also stated that they would file a publicly redacted version.

The provided text does not show that Judge Kaplan granted or denied the request. It only presents defendants’ request and the reasons they gave for sealing the material.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cerveceria Modelo de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. v. CB Brand Strategies, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-01317
Judge
Lewis Kaplan
Date
Apr. 19, 2022

Nature of the Document

The provided text is a letter dated April 18, 2022, from defendants’ counsel to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. It asks for permission to file under seal portions of defendants’ memorandum supporting a motion for reconsideration. The text supplied does not contain a judicial order or opinion ruling on that request.

Parties and Request

The letter states that counsel represents CB Brand Strategies, LLC, Crown Imports LLC, and Compania Cervecera de Coahuila, S. de R.L. de C.V. The defendants asked to file redacted portions of their memorandum under seal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d), the parties’ stipulated protective order and confidentiality agreement, and Judge Kaplan’s individual rules.

Reasons Given for Sealing

The letter says that the plaintiffs designated an expert report, except for the expert’s curriculum vitae, as “Highly Confidential.” Defendants took no position on that designation. The letter also says the report contains documents and testimony that defendants designated as confidential or highly confidential because of the information’s confidential and commercially sensitive nature.

Defendants stated that their memorandum referred to confidential and commercially sensitive information about aspects of the brewing processes for their products. They characterized that information as proprietary and not generally known to the public. The letter cited a prior Southern District of New York decision concerning redactions of proprietary business matters.

Proposed Filing

The letter states that defendants would submit the proposed sealed document through the court’s electronic filing system and would also file a publicly redacted version of the memorandum.

Disposition

The provided text does not state whether Judge Kaplan granted, denied, or otherwise resolved the request to file under seal. Accordingly, it shows a party request, not a judicial ruling.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.