Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 22, 2022

Yan Luis v. Medley, Inc.

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:22-cv-02260
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureADA / Disability
In one sentence

In Yan Luis v. Medley, Judge Roman transferred the website-accessibility lawsuit to the Eastern District of New York because this district lacked a specific connection.

Who this affects

The case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. Luis's underlying claims remain to be addressed by the transferee court, along with any pending motions.

What happened

In Kevin Yan Luis v. Medley, Inc., the plaintiff claimed that Medley failed to make its website fully accessible and independently usable for blind or visually impaired people. He asserted claims under federal, New York State, and New York City disability-rights laws.

The court noted that the complaint said Luis lived in Kings County, that the relevant website-access attempts occurred there, and that the complaint did not show a specific connection to the Southern District of New York. The court therefore transferred the case to the Eastern District of New York rather than deciding the underlying disability claims.

Judge Nelson S. Roman ordered the clerk to transfer the case file. Any pending motions will be addressed by the Eastern District court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Yan Luis v. Medley, Inc. · No. 7:22-cv-02260
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Apr. 22, 2022

Background

Kevin Yan Luis sued Medley, Inc., asserting claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York State Civil Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. He alleged that Medley failed to design and operate a website that was fully accessible and independently usable by blind or visually impaired people.

The complaint stated that Medley was an Oregon limited liability company, that Luis resided in Kings County, and that the relevant events or omissions occurred there. Luis nevertheless alleged that venue was proper in the Southern District of New York because Medley conducted substantial business there and because he had attempted to use the website in that district.

Venue Analysis

The court discussed the federal venue statute, which permits a civil action in certain districts connected to the defendant or to the events underlying the claims. When venue is improper, 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) permits a court to dismiss the case or, when appropriate, transfer it to a district where the case could have been brought. The court explained that transfer is ordinarily the preferred remedy and that a court may order a transfer on its own initiative.

The court found that the complaint clearly alleged that Luis resided in Kings County and that his attempts to access Medley's website occurred there. It also found that there did not appear to be any specific connection to the Southern District of New York.

Disposition

The court TRANSFERS the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The clerk was directed to transfer the case file, and the transferee court will address any pending motions. The order did not decide the merits of Luis's disability-related claims.

Judge

Nelson S. Roman, United States District Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.