Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 25, 2022

United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Qin

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:20-cv-10849
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Qin, Judge Schofield granted the receiver’s fourth fee application, authorizing payments for receiver-team work.

Who this affects

The court-appointed receiver, the receiver team, and the receivership estate were directly affected because the receiver was authorized to pay the requested fees and expenses.

What happened

United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Qin concerns a court-appointed receiver’s request to approve fees and expenses for work performed from October through December 2021.

The application requested $621,540.90 for BakerHostetler, $256,214.52 for Ankura Consulting Group, and $1,298.70 for Nelsons Attorneys-at-Law, Ltd., along with payments to Elliptic and CipherTrace for initial services. The work included cryptocurrency recovery, forensic accounting, claims administration, subpoenas, property analysis, and witness interviews.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield granted the application and authorized the receiver to make all requested payments. The court relied in part on the SEC’s approval and found that the receiver team performed significant, complex, and beneficial work for the receivership estate.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Qin · No. 1:20-cv-10849
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Apr. 25, 2022

Background

Court-appointed Receiver Robert A. Musiala, Jr., Esq., of Baker & Hostetler submitted the Fourth Fee Application. The application sought approval of fees and expenses incurred between October 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021.

The application requested approval of $621,540.90 for BakerHostetler, $256,214.52 for Ankura Consulting Group, and $1,298.70 for Nelsons Attorneys-at-Law, Ltd. It also requested approval of payments to Elliptic, Inc., and CipherTrace Inc. for three months of initial services. The receiver and the receiver team submitted invoices describing the work performed.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that a receiver who reasonably and diligently performs the receiver’s duties is entitled to fair compensation for services and expenses. The reasonableness of a fee application is judged in the court’s discretion, including by considering the hourly rates and the number of hours billed. The court also considered the complexity of the problems faced, the benefits to the receivership estate, the quality of the work, and the time records.

The SEC reviewed and approved the application, which the court said deserved great weight. The billing records reflected substantial work involving asset analysis and recovery, forensic accounting, claims administration, cryptocurrency custody and liquidation, subpoenas and information requests, property sales and disposition, analysis of potential claims, investigation of financial institutions and cryptocurrency-exchange accounts, and witness interviews. The receiver and Ankura also applied significant discounts and fee write-offs during the application period.

Ruling

The court granted the Fourth Fee Application. It authorized the receiver to make the total payments requested, including payments to Elliptic and CipherTrace for their initial services.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.