Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 25, 2022

Gonzalez v. NutriBullet, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:21-cv-06365
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Gonzalez v. NutriBullet, Judge Vyskocil denied a request to delete or seal a letter from the court docket.

Who this affects

The ruling affected the plaintiff and the public availability of the filed letter; the opinion does not identify the plaintiff by first name.

What happened

In Gonzalez v. NutriBullet, LLC, the plaintiff’s counsel asked the court to delete or seal an earlier letter filed in the case.

The court said judicial documents are strongly presumed to be open to the public. It also said that once settlement information becomes public, the court cannot make it private again.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil denied the request because counsel offered no argument or explanation sufficient to overcome the presumption of public access.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gonzalez v. NutriBullet, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-06365
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 25, 2022

Background

The plaintiff’s counsel asked the court to delete an earlier letter from the docket or place it under seal.

Court’s reasoning

The court stated that judicial documents carry a strong presumption of public access. It found that the plaintiff’s counsel had not offered an argument or explanation sufficient to overcome that presumption. The court also stated that once information about a settlement is made public, it has no power to make that information private again.

Disposition

The court denied the request to delete or seal the letter.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.