Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 25, 2022

Ergin v. 8th Hill Inc.

Judge
Alison Nathan
Docket
1:20-cv-04594
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
EmploymentFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ergin v. 8th Hill Inc., Judge Nathan adopted a damages recommendation and entered judgment for Ergin after his wage-and-hour default judgment.

Who this affects

Mehmet Emre Ergin received the judgment; the three defendants were ordered to pay the amounts specified in the order, including interest and potentially the 15-percent increase.

What happened

In Ergin v. 8th Hill Inc., the court had already granted Mehmet Emre Ergin’s request for default judgment on wage-and-hour claims against all three defendants. The court then sent the case to Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein to determine damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs.

Judge Gorenstein recommended $26,605.72 in unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and statutory damages; interest on unpaid wages; $6,195 in attorneys’ fees; and $400 in costs. No party objected before the deadline, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Alison J. Nathan adopted the recommendation in full and ordered judgment for Ergin. The order included prejudgment and post-judgment interest, a possible 15-percent increase if the judgment remains unpaid under specified conditions, and closure of the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ergin v. 8th Hill Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-04594
Judge
Alison Nathan
Date
Apr. 25, 2022

Background

The court had previously granted Mehmet Emre Ergin’s motion for default judgment on his wage-and-hour claims against all three defendants. Because the court could not determine his damages with reasonable certainty at that stage, it referred the damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs issues to Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein for an inquest.

Judge Gorenstein issued an amended Report and Recommendation. It recommended that Ergin receive $26,605.72 in unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and statutory damages; prejudgment interest on the unpaid wages; $6,195 in attorneys’ fees; and $400 in litigation costs.

Court’s review and ruling

No objection to the amended Report and Recommendation was filed, and the objection deadline had passed. Judge Alison J. Nathan therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error—whether the record left the court with a firm conviction that a mistake had been made—and found none. The court adopted the recommendation in its entirety.

The court ordered judgment in Ergin’s favor and against the defendants for:

- $26,605.72 in unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and statutory damages; - prejudgment interest on unpaid wages at $2.05 per day from November 25, 2019, through the date judgment is entered; - $6,195 in attorneys’ fees, as stated in the recommendation; - $400 in litigation costs; - a possible automatic 15-percent increase if the judgment is not entirely paid within the period specified in the order and no appeal is pending; and - post-judgment interest at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

The court stated that the damages, fees, and costs calculated in the recommendation totaled $33,200.72. The order’s numbered fee item appears as "$6,1950," which conflicts with the recommendation’s $6,195 figure and the stated total. The court directed Ergin to serve the order on the defendants, directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment, and closed the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.