Chicco v. First UNUM Life Insurance Company
- Denise Cote
- 1:20-cv-10593
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Chicco v. First UNUM, Judge Cote discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration by May 25, 2022, otherwise dismissal became with prejudice.
Michelle Chicco and First UNUM Life Insurance Company; the action was discontinued after the reported settlement, subject to possible restoration by May 25, 2022.
What happened
Michelle Chicco sued First UNUM Life Insurance Company, and the court was informed that the case had settled.
The court discontinued the case without costs to either party. The case could be restored to the court’s calendar if an application was made by May 25, 2022.
Judge Denise Cote ordered that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored through that procedure.
The detailed version
- Chicco v. First UNUM Life Insurance Company · No. 1:20-cv-10593
- Denise Cote
- Apr. 25, 2022
Background
The court stated that it had been informed that the case had settled. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or describe the underlying claims.
Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. An application to restore the action had to be made by May 25, 2022. If no application was made by that date, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.