Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 26, 2022

Vazquez-Diaz v. John Doe Warden of MCCLNY

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-03332
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro SeSection 1983
In one sentence

In Vazquez-Diaz v. John Doe Warden, Judge Swain dismissed the duplicate lawsuit without prejudice and waived its filing fee.

Who this affects

Luis Vazquez-Diaz, the defendants in the duplicate lawsuit, and the officials responsible for processing the filing fee and his prison trust account.

What happened

In Vazquez-Diaz v. John Doe Warden of MCC/NY, Luis Vazquez-Diaz filed a lawsuit claiming that his constitutional rights were violated during incarceration in New York. He filed the case without a lawyer, and an identical case against the same defendants was already pending.

The court dismissed this lawsuit without prejudice because it duplicated the pending case, docket number 22-CV-3315 (UA). The court also directed that Vazquez-Diaz not be charged the $350 filing fee and that no funds be deducted or held from his prison account for this lawsuit.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying the appeal costs. The order did not decide the underlying constitutional claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vazquez-Diaz v. John Doe Warden of MCCLNY · No. 1:22-cv-03332
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 26, 2022

Background

Luis Vazquez-Diaz, who was incarcerated at the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri, filed this lawsuit without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that his constitutional rights were violated during his incarceration in New York. The opinion states that he had already filed an identical complaint against the same defendants and that the earlier case, docket number 22-CV-3315 (UA), remained pending.

Court’s reasoning

The court concluded that the new lawsuit duplicated the pending case. Because the claims and defendants were the same, the court found that filing and litigating the second lawsuit would serve no useful purpose. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice to Vazquez-Diaz’s pending case. The dismissal was based on duplication; the court did not decide whether the alleged constitutional violations occurred.

Rulings

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice as duplicative of docket number 22-CV-3315 (UA). It directed the Clerk of Court not to charge Vazquez-Diaz the $350 filing fee for this action, and directed that the official having custody of him not deduct or encumber funds from his prison trust account for this lawsuit. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying appeal costs.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.