Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 28, 2022

Monegro v. Try Treats, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:21-cv-03354
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Monegro v. Try Treats, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by June 28, 2022.

Who this affects

Frankie Monegro, the defendant, and the people Monegro described as similarly situated were affected by the discontinuance and the June 28, 2022 deadline to seek restoration.

What happened

In Monegro v. Try Treats, LLC, Frankie Monegro told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. He had brought the case on behalf of himself and others described as similarly situated.

The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application was made by June 28, 2022. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also postponed all other dates and deadlines without setting a new date.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the dismissal order on April 28, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Monegro v. Try Treats, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-03354
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 28, 2022

Background

Frankie Monegro brought the action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. The court received a letter from Monegro stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Ruling

The court ordered that the case be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar. A party could apply to restore the case by June 28, 2022. The order stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. The court adjourned all other dates and deadlines without setting a new date.

What the Order Did Not Decide

The order did not decide the merits of the claims or state that the court approved the settlement. It disposed of the case based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.