Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 3, 2022

Labombard v. Harrell

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-02196
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Labombard v. Harrell, Judge Swain ordered the unrepresented plaintiff to pay filing fees or submit a valid prison-account authorization within 30 days.

Who this affects

Schoen M. Labombard, whose action must meet the court's filing-fee or prisoner-authorization requirement to proceed.

What happened

In Labombard v. Harrell, Schoen M. Labombard filed a civil action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The court said his earlier prison-account authorization allowed deductions only for the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. After the court directed him to pay $402 or submit a completed authorization, he submitted another fee-waiver application but not the required authorization.

The court gave Labombard another 30 days to pay the $402 fee or submit the attached authorization, warning that the action will be dismissed if he does not comply. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Labombard v. Harrell · No. 1:22-cv-02196
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 3, 2022

Background

Schoen M. Labombard, who was incarcerated at Greene Correctional Facility, brought this action without a lawyer. He submitted a complaint, an application to proceed without paying the filing fee, and a prison authorization. The authorization allowed money deducted from his prison account to be sent only to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.

In an earlier order dated March 18, 2022, the court directed Labombard either to pay the $402 required filing fee or to submit a completed prisoner authorization within 30 days. On March 30, 2022, the court received another application to proceed without paying the fee, but it did not receive the requested authorization.

Order

Because Labombard was proceeding without a lawyer, the court gave him another opportunity to submit a valid prisoner authorization. The court directed him, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $402 filing fee or to submit the attached authorization. If he complies, the case will be processed under the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order addressed filing requirements and did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.