Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 3, 2022

Vega v. Berryhill

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:19-cv-01118-OTW
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Social SecurityFee Petition
In one sentence

In Vega v. Kijakazi, Judge Wang approved $15,000 in attorney fees from Orlando Vega’s past-due Social Security benefits.

Who this affects

Orlando Vega and his attorney, Lewis B. Insler; the Social Security Administration was directed to process the approved payment.

What happened

In Vega v. Kijakazi, Orlando Vega asked the court to approve a $15,000 attorney-fee payment under the Social Security Act after his case was sent back to the Social Security Administration and he received past-due benefits.

The fee agreement allowed counsel to receive up to 25% of Vega’s past-due benefits. The court found that the requested amount was within that limit, was not obtained through fraud or pressure, and was not an unreasonable extra payment for the 32.91 hours of work performed. Counsel had also received $6,947.61 under a separate fee law.

The court granted Vega’s motion and directed the Social Security Administration to pay $15,000 to Lewis B. Insler. Judge Wang also required Insler to promptly refund $6,947.61 to Vega after receiving the payment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vega v. Berryhill · No. 1:19-cv-01118-OTW
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
May 3, 2022

Background

Orlando Vega moved for approval of attorney fees under Section 406(b) of the Social Security Act. His written contingency-fee agreement with attorney Lewis B. Insler provided for a fee of 25% of any past-due benefits obtained after a successful court remand and favorable decision on remand.

The court had previously remanded Vega’s case to the Social Security Administration, which later found him disabled and awarded past-due benefits. The Social Security Administration withheld $28,645 from those benefits for possible legal fees. Insler sought approval of a $15,000 fee, which was less than 25% of the past-due benefits. The Commissioner did not object.

Insler had also received $6,947.61 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Vega’s motion acknowledged that Insler would have to return that amount to Vega if the Section 406(b) fee was approved.

Court’s analysis

Section 406(b) permits a court to approve a reasonable attorney fee of no more than 25% of a claimant’s past-due benefits. The court explained that contingency-fee agreements are the usual way fees are set in successful Social Security cases, but the court must independently review the requested fee for reasonableness.

The court considered whether the requested fee exceeded the 25% limit, whether the agreement resulted from fraud or improper pressure, and whether the fee would be an unjustified windfall to counsel. It found that all three considerations favored approval. The requested fee was within the statutory limit, there was no evidence of fraud or improper pressure, and Insler had spent 32.91 hours on the matter, including researching and drafting legal memoranda addressing a 620-page administrative record.

Ruling

The court granted Vega’s unopposed motion. It directed the Social Security Administration to approve payment of $15,000 to Lewis B. Insler and ordered Insler to promptly refund $6,947.61 to Vega upon receiving that payment. Judge Ona T. Wang signed the opinion and order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.