Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 3, 2022

Zhang v. Great Sichuan On 3rd Ave., Inc.

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:15-cv-04558
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
11
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Zhang v. Great Sichuan, Judge Koeltl directed plaintiffs to obtain default certificates and properly seek default judgment by May 20.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and the defendants against whom the plaintiffs sought default judgments, including Run Lu Zhuai and Chang Guo Yang. The order also directed notice to the pro se parties.

What happened

In Zhang v. Great Sichuan on 3rd Ave., Inc., the plaintiffs sought default judgments against defendants who allegedly failed to respond or appear. The court found that the plaintiffs had not followed the required steps.

The court said the plaintiffs must obtain a certificate of default from the Clerk for each defendant against whom they seek judgment. They must then ask the court for a default judgment through an order requiring a response, supported by an affidavit and the certificates. The opinion states that certificates had already been obtained for Run Lu Zhuai and Chang Guo Yang, but the plaintiffs had not completed the next step.

By May 20, the plaintiffs were directed to seek default judgment against the relevant defendants. Judge John G. Koeltl warned that the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute if they did not do so. The order also directed the Clerk to mail it to the pro se parties.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zhang v. Great Sichuan On 3rd Ave., Inc. · No. 1:15-cv-04558
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
May 3, 2022

Background

The plaintiffs sought default judgments against numerous defendants. A default judgment is a judgment entered when a defendant has failed to respond or otherwise participate in the case. The court stated that the plaintiffs had not complied with the procedural requirements for obtaining such a judgment.

The order explains that, when a defendant has failed to respond to the summons and complaint or has otherwise failed to appear—including when a corporation has failed to appear through a lawyer—the plaintiff should first obtain a certificate of default from the Clerk under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and Local Civil Rule 55.1. The plaintiff should then apply for a default judgment by an order to show cause, supported by the Clerk’s certificate of default, under Rule 55(b) and Local Civil Rule 55.2.

Specific Case Status

The court’s docket review showed that the plaintiffs had obtained certificates of default for Run Lu Zhuai and Chang Guo Yang, identified as ECF Nos. 131 and 132. The plaintiffs had not followed those certificates with an order to show cause seeking default judgment. The order states that the plaintiffs then sought default judgments against numerous other defendants.

Order

The court directed the plaintiffs to obtain certificates of default for every defendant against whom they seek a default judgment. The plaintiffs must then move by order to show cause for default judgment against all such defendants. The order to show cause must be supported by an affidavit with the certificates of default attached.

The deadline set in the order was May 20. The court stated that the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute if the plaintiffs did not move by order to show cause by that date. The order did not itself enter a default judgment or dismiss the case. Judge John G. Koeltl also directed the Clerk to mail a copy of the order to the pro se parties and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 11-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.