Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 6, 2022

Labossiere v. Downstate Correctional Facility

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-10540
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Labossiere v. Downstate Correctional Facility, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint after Labossiere failed to amend it as ordered.

Who this affects

Wilfred Labossiere's complaint was dismissed. The defendants named in the case were Downstate Correctional Facility, C.O. Akinwunmi, and C.O. A. Jones. Labossiere was also denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.

What happened

In Labossiere v. Downstate Correctional Facility, the court had ordered Wilfred Labossiere to file an amended complaint within 60 days.

Labossiere did not file an amended complaint by the deadline. The opinion does not describe the claims or explain why the original complaint failed to state a legally sufficient claim.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint under the statute governing screening of complaints filed without paying the filing fee. She also denied Labossiere permission to appeal without paying the filing fee, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Labossiere v. Downstate Correctional Facility · No. 1:21-cv-10540
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 6, 2022

Background

Wilfred Labossiere sued Downstate Correctional Facility, C.O. Akinwunmi, and C.O. A. Jones. The court had allowed him to file without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). In an order dated February 7, 2022, the court directed Labossiere to file an amended complaint within 60 days and warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal.

Ruling

Labossiere did not file an amended complaint. The court therefore dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). This was a screening dismissal; the opinion does not provide a merits analysis of the underlying claims.

Appeal-Filing-Fee Ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.