Guerrero v. A.M. Leonard, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-02467
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Guerrero v. A.M. Leonard, Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action without costs after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by June 9, 2022.
Edelmira Guerrero, A. M. Leonard, Inc., and the other people described in the caption as similarly situated.
What happened
Guerrero v. A.M. Leonard, Inc. was brought by Edel mira Guerrero individually and on behalf of others described as similarly situated against A. M. Leonard, Inc. The opinion says the parties reached a settlement in principle.
The court did not decide the underlying claims. Instead, it ordered the action discontinued without costs to any party and allowed it to be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil set June 9, 2022, as the deadline for an application to restore the action. If no application was made by then, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Guerrero v. A.M. Leonard, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-02467
- Vyskocil
- May 9, 2022
Background
Edelmira Guerrero sued A. M. Leonard, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The court received a letter from Guerrero informing it that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the proposed settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuance was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by June 9, 2022. The court further stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Effect
This order resolved the case procedurally based on the parties’ settlement in principle; it did not decide the merits of Guerrero’s claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.