Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 10, 2022

Bonilla v. Danes Parking Corp.

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:20-cv-10184
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Bonilla v. Danes Parking Corp., Judge Lehrburger approved the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Rafael Pena Bonilla and the defendants, including Danes Parking Corp., are affected by the settlement approval and dismissal of the case with prejudice.

What happened

Bonilla v. Danes Parking Corp. was a damages lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement.

The court reviewed the agreement and found it fair and reasonable. It noted that the agreement had no confidentiality restrictions, narrowly released wage-and-hour claims, and provided attorney fees within a fair and acceptable range.

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger approved the settlement and dismissed the case in its entirety with prejudice. The court imposed no costs or fees on either party except as provided in the settlement agreement, terminated the motions and deadlines, and ordered the case closed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bonilla v. Danes Parking Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-10184
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
May 10, 2022

Background

Rafael Pena Bonilla brought an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing certain wage and hour rights, and the New York Labor Law. The parties submitted a joint request for approval of their settlement agreement, along with a fully executed copy.

Settlement Review

The court explained that a federal court must determine whether an agreement resolving a Fair Labor Standards Act case is fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiation rather than employer overreaching. The court reviewed the settlement agreement and the parties’ letter, considering the prior proceedings, the risks and costs of continuing the case, the possible recovery, the bargaining process, attorney fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.

The court noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality restrictions, narrowly limited the release to wage-and-hour claims, and provided attorney fees within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range. Considering all the circumstances, the court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it.

Disposition

Because the case was resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued it in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.