Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 10, 2022

Klein v. Phyton Talent Advisors LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:21-cv-09248
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFlsaEmployment
In one sentence

In Tzvi Klein v. Phyton Talent Advisers, Judge Caproni approved the parties’ process and dismissed the non-FLSA claims with prejudice.

Who this affects

Tzvi Klein, Phyton Talent Advisers, LLC, and Societe Generale Americas were affected. The court dismissed Klein’s non-FLSA claims with prejudice, while setting a deadline for filing the proposed Rule 68 offer addressing the FLSA claims.

What happened

Tzvi Klein v. Phyton Talent Advisers, LLC and Societe Generale Americas involved Klein’s claims under New Jersey law for religious discrimination, whistleblower retaliation, and overtime claims under federal and New Jersey law.

The parties reported that they had reached an agreement through mediation. They proposed resolving the overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act through a Rule 68 offer of judgment, which would be filed by June 1, 2022, and resolving the remaining claims through a private settlement.

Judge Caproni granted the application, canceled all previously scheduled conferences and deadlines, and dismissed the non-overtime claims with prejudice and without costs, including attorney fees, to either party. The order also explained how the parties could ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Klein v. Phyton Talent Advisors LLC · No. 1:21-cv-09248
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
May 10, 2022

Background

Tzvi Klein asserted claims for religious discrimination and whistleblower retaliation under New Jersey law. He also asserted overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal wage-and-hour law, and New Jersey law. The parties reported that they participated in the Southern District of New York’s mediation program on March 9, 2022, and reached an agreement on all issues.

Requested procedure

The court had previously required the parties to seek approval if they wanted to dismiss Klein’s FLSA claims with prejudice. The parties asked to adjourn that deadline indefinitely and to receive until June 1, 2022, to submit a Rule 68 offer of judgment resolving the FLSA claims. A Rule 68 offer of judgment is a formal offer to allow judgment for specified relief. The parties stated that they intended to dismiss the remaining non-FLSA claims under a private settlement agreement after Klein accepted the offer and the court entered the resulting judgment.

Ruling

Judge Caproni granted the application. The parties were required to file the Rule 68 offer of judgment by June 1, 2022, and all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines were canceled. The court dismissed the non-FLSA claims with prejudice and without costs, including attorney fees, to either party. The order did not state the amount or terms of the proposed FLSA offer. It provided that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—authority to enforce the settlement agreement—they had to file the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.