Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 16, 2022

Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee v…

Full caption

Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee v. Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:20-cv-07606
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

Blue Cross v. Allianz: Judge Failla granted Aon’s application to redact its third-party complaint and file certain exhibits under seal.

Who this affects

Aon Investments USA Inc. may file a redacted third-party complaint and certain exhibits under seal. The order also protects confidential information designated by Aon, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee, Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, and a third party, including information concerning actual or potential third-party investments.

What happened

In Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee v. Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, Aon Investments USA Inc. asked to file a redacted third-party complaint against James R. Sharpe and Terrence J. Cooney.

Aon also asked to file certain exhibits under seal because they contained information designated confidential under the parties’ protective order, including information about actual or potential third-party investments.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application. She allowed Aon to file the redacted complaint and certain exhibits under seal, and directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 195.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee v… · No. 1:20-cv-07606
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
May 16, 2022

Background

Aon Investments USA Inc. filed a third-party complaint against James R. Sharpe and Terrence J. Cooney. Aon asked for permission to submit a redacted version of that complaint and to file certain exhibits under seal. The request relied on the parties’ stipulated amended protective order and the court’s rules governing confidential filings.

The protective order covered information designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” during discovery. It required protected material submitted to the court to be filed in redacted form or under seal to the extent allowed by court rules and Judge Failla’s practices. Aon identified Exhibits A through G and I through T as documents designated confidential by Aon, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee, Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, or a third party. Aon stated that the materials included significant information about actual or potential third-party investments and implicated third parties’ privacy interests.

Ruling

The court granted Aon’s application. Aon may file a redacted version of its third-party complaint and certain exhibits to that complaint under seal. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 195. The order did not decide the underlying dispute between the parties or the third-party claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.