Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 16, 2022

Terez v. Kambouris

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:22-cv-02834
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureCivil RightsSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Terez v. Kambouris, Judge Koeltl ordered service of an excessive-force lawsuit brought by a plaintiff without a lawyer.

Who this affects

Jahw’rel Terez; Manolis Kambouris; the City of New York; the Clerk of Court; and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Terez v. Kambouris, Jahw’rel Terez alleges that Police Officer Manolis Kambouris used excessive force during an arrest. Terez sued Kambouris and the City of New York under a federal civil-rights law.

The court had allowed Terez to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. Because he was proceeding without a lawyer and could not arrange service before the court reviewed his complaint, the court extended the service deadline to 90 days after summonses are issued.

Judge John G. Koeltl instructed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, complete service forms, and send the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service for service on the City of New York and Kambouris. The order did not decide whether the excessive-force allegations were true.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Terez v. Kambouris · No. 1:22-cv-02834
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
May 16, 2022

Background

Jahw’rel Terez, proceeding without a lawyer, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims for violations of constitutional rights by state or local officials. Terez alleges that Manolis Kambouris, identified as a police officer, used excessive force against him during an arrest. The defendants are Kambouris and the City of New York.

The court had previously granted Terez permission to proceed without prepaying court fees. In such cases, the court and the U.S. Marshals Service can handle service of the summons and complaint.

Service Order

The court explained that the usual 90-day service period could not begin in the ordinary way because Terez could not serve the defendants until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses to be issued. The court therefore extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses are issued. The court stated that Terez should request an extension if service is not completed within that period and must notify the court in writing if his address changes.

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for the City of New York and Manolis Kambouris, complete USM-285 service forms with the defendants’ listed addresses, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Terez an information package.

Effect of the Order

This was an order arranging service of the lawsuit. It did not decide whether Kambouris used excessive force, whether the City of New York was liable, or any other underlying claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.