Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 17, 2022

Annabi v. New York University Stern School of Business

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:22-cv-03795
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePreliminary InjunctionPro Se
In one sentence

In Annabi v. New York University Stern School of Business, Judge Liman denied emergency relief, dismissed claims for others, and ordered service.

Who this affects

Karim Annabi’s request for emergency relief was denied without prejudice, and his claims on behalf of other contest participants were dismissed without prejudice. His own contract and discrimination claims were not resolved in this order; he was directed to serve the defendant within 90 days.

What happened

In Annabi v. New York University Stern School of Business, Karim Annabi brought a lawsuit without a lawyer against the school, alleging breach of an implied contract and discrimination based on age, race, religion, and national origin. He also sought emergency court orders to stop alleged ongoing misconduct affecting him and others who entered or had entered the defendant’s contests.

The court said emergency relief required showing likely irreparable harm and either a likely win or serious legal questions combined with hardships favoring Annabi. The court found that his submissions did not make the required showing. Because he was not a lawyer, he also could not pursue claims for other people.

Judge Liman denied the request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction without prejudice to renewal later, dismissed without prejudice the claims brought for other individuals, and directed the clerk to issue a summons. Annabi was directed to serve the summons and complaint within 90 days; the order did not resolve his own contract and discrimination claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Annabi v. New York University Stern School of Business · No. 1:22-cv-03795
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
May 17, 2022

Background

Karim Annabi brought this action without a lawyer and paid the filing fees. He alleged that New York University Stern School of Business breached an implied contract and discriminated against him based on age, race, religion, and national origin. He also sought emergency injunctive relief—court orders intended to prevent alleged ongoing misconduct and immediate, irreparable injuries to him and to other people who entered or were entering the defendant’s contests.

Emergency Injunctive Relief

The court explained that a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction requires a showing of likely irreparable harm and either a likelihood of success on the merits or sufficiently serious questions for litigation together with a balance of hardships strongly favoring the requesting party. The court found that Annabi’s submissions did not demonstrate either a likelihood of success or sufficiently serious questions combined with the required balance of hardships.

The court therefore denied without prejudice to renewal at a later date Annabi’s request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The order did not decide the ultimate merits of Annabi’s own contract and discrimination claims.

Claims on Behalf of Other People

The court ruled that, as a nonlawyer, Annabi could represent only his own interests. It therefore dismissed without prejudice any claims he sought to assert on behalf of people who entered or had entered the defendant’s contests, including requests for relief for those individuals.

Service and Other Directions

The clerk was directed to issue a summons for New York University Stern School of Business. Annabi was directed to serve the summons and complaint within 90 days after the summons was issued. The court stated that, if he did not serve the defendant or request an extension within that period, it could dismiss the claims against the defendant under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute.

The court also directed the clerk to send Annabi an information package. It certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. Judge Liman signed the order on May 17, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.