Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 19, 2022

Trustees of the Mason Tenders Distrcit Council Welfare Fund v. RC Group Inc

Full caption

Trustees of the Mason Tenders Distrcit Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Training Program Fund v. RC Group Inc

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:22-cv-04062
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureArbitration
In one sentence

Trustees v. RC Group Inc.: Judge Furman set deadlines for briefing and service concerning a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners seeking confirmation of the arbitration award and RC Group Inc., the respondent, were affected by the filing, opposition, reply, and service deadlines.

What happened

In Trustees of the Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Training Program Fund v. RC Group Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award.

The order did not decide whether the award should be confirmed. It required the petitioners to file any additional supporting materials and serve the petition, supporting papers, and order by May 31, 2022. The respondent could oppose by June 14, and the petitioners could reply by June 21.

Judge Jesse M. Furman also required the petitioners to file proof of service by June 1, 2022. The order set procedures and deadlines but did not grant or deny the petition.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the Mason Tenders Distrcit Council Welfare Fund v. RC Group Inc · No. 1:22-cv-04062
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
May 19, 2022

Background

On May 19, 2022, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment, which is a request for judgment based on the record when there is no genuine dispute requiring a trial.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by May 31, 2022. The respondent’s opposition, if any, was due June 14, 2022, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due June 21, 2022.

The petitioners also had to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on the respondent electronically and by overnight mail by May 31, 2022. They had to file an affidavit confirming that service by June 1, 2022.

Result

Judge Jesse M. Furman issued a scheduling and service order. The opinion did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award and did not state that the petition or any motion was granted or denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.