Salaam v. City of New York
- James Oetken
- 1:22-cv-04155
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Salaam v. City of New York, Judge Swain ordered Aziz Salaam to pay filing fees or submit forms within 30 days.
Aziz Salaam, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the filing fees or submit the required forms within 30 days to continue the action.
What happened
In Salaam v. City of New York, Aziz Salaam filed a civil-rights lawsuit without paying the required filing fees or submitting the forms needed to request permission to proceed without paying upfront. The opinion says he is incarcerated and representing himself.
The court ordered Salaam, within 30 days, either to pay $402 or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment and a prisoner authorization form. If he submits the forms, the filing fee will be collected from his prison account in installments. The court said no summons would issue yet and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from this order would not qualify for fee-free status because it would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims in Salaam’s lawsuit.
The detailed version
- Salaam v. City of New York · No. 1:22-cv-04155
- James Oetken
- May 20, 2022
Background
Aziz Salaam filed this action against the City of New York, Commissioner Louis Molina, the New York City Department of Correction, and Warden Joseph Caputo. The opinion states that Salaam is incarcerated at the Anna M. Kross Center on Rikers Island and is proceeding without a lawyer.
A prisoner filing a civil action must either pay the required fees or request permission to proceed without prepayment of fees. Salaam submitted his complaint without paying the fees and without a completed application or prisoner authorization.
Court’s Order
The court ordered Salaam to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay $402 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee, or submit the attached application to proceed without prepayment and prisoner authorization forms. The prisoner authorization would allow the facility to deduct the $350 filing fee from Salaam’s account in installments and provide the court with certified account statements for the previous six months. The court noted that the $52 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepayment.
No summons would issue at that time. If Salaam complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he did not comply within the allowed period, the action would be dismissed.
Appeal and Caution
Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a filing “strike” under the prisoner litigation statute. This order addressed filing requirements and did not decide the merits of Salaam’s claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.