Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 23, 2022

Chanel Inc. v. Various John Does

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:22-cv-03790
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Chanel v. Various John Does: Judge Gardephe allowed temporary sealing and ordered the case closed.

Who this affects

Chanel, Inc. and the unidentified defendants named in the caption are affected by the temporary sealing order. Court access is restricted, and the Clerk was directed to close the case.

What happened

In Chanel, Inc. v. Various John Does, Jane Does, and XYZ Companies, Chanel asked to file a new civil case under seal using paper filings.

The court found sufficient cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) to restrict access to the case temporarily.

Judge Gardephe allowed the case to be filed under seal for one week or until further order, directed the parties to follow the court’s sealed-filing instructions, and ordered the Clerk to restrict access and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chanel Inc. v. Various John Does · No. 1:22-cv-03790
Judge
James Oetken
Date
May 23, 2022

Background

Chanel, Inc. moved to file a new civil case under seal using traditional paper filings. The defendants are identified in the caption as Various John Does, Jane Does, and XYZ Companies.

Court’s ruling

The court found sufficient cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) to permit the case to be filed under seal. The court allowed sealing for one week or until further order. It directed the parties to follow the court’s electronic filing rules and instructions for sealed filings and to present the initiating documents to the Clerk of Court in paper form. The Clerk was directed to restrict access to the order to the selected party viewing level and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.