Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 25, 2022

SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. v. Arcesium LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-02009
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In SS&C Technologies v. Arcesium, Judge Caproni granted redactions to the amended complaint and allowed its unredacted version to be filed under seal.

Who this affects

SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc., Advent Software, Inc., Arcesium LLC, and members of the public seeking access to the First Amended Complaint.

What happened

SS&C Technologies Holdings and Advent Software sued Arcesium, alleging trade-secret misappropriation, breach of contract, unfair competition, and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. The amended complaint quoted or referred to documents Arcesium had marked confidential.

The parties jointly asked to redact parts of the amended complaint and file the unredacted version privately. They said the material included Arcesium’s confidential sales and business-development strategies, including information about proprietary technologies.

Judge Valerie E. Caproni granted the application and ordered the amended complaint’s specified portions redacted and its unredacted version filed under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. v. Arcesium LLC · No. 1:22-cv-02009
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
May 25, 2022

Background

SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. and Advent Software, Inc. brought the action against Arcesium LLC. The opinion states that the plaintiffs alleged misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, unfair competition, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint referred to and quoted documents that Arcesium had designated as confidential under a protective order.

Request to Restrict Public Access

The parties jointly requested permission to redact portions of the First Amended Complaint and file the unredacted version under seal. They identified the material as confidential commercial information concerning Arcesium’s sales and business-development strategies, including the development of proprietary technologies.

The opinion explained that judicial documents generally carry a presumption of public access. Courts weigh that presumption against countervailing interests, including privacy concerns and the potential injury from disclosure. The opinion stated that confidential commercial information may be protected when disclosure could harm a litigant’s competitive position.

Ruling

Judge Valerie E. Caproni granted the parties’ application. The order therefore permitted the requested redactions and the filing of the unredacted First Amended Complaint under seal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.