Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

DeRouseau v. Family Court

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-08716
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFamily
In one sentence

In DeRouseau v. Family Court, Chief Judge Swain dismissed K.M.D.’s claims without prejudice and dismissed the rest under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Who this affects

K.M.D.’s claims were dismissed without prejudice, and the remainder of the plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed.

What happened

In DeRouseau v. Family Court, Kyle G. DeRouseau and K.M.D., a minor, were the plaintiffs in a complaint against the Family Court of Westchester County and several individuals. The judgment followed an order dated May 31, 2022, that dismissed the complaint.

The court dismissed K.M.D.’s claims without prejudice because a non-attorney parent cannot bring claims for a minor child. It dismissed the remainder of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii). The court also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on May 31, 2022. The judgment does not describe the underlying claims or explain the specific reasons corresponding to the cited statutory provisions.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
DeRouseau v. Family Court · No. 1:21-cv-08716
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 31, 2022

Background

Kyle G. DeRouseau and K.M.D., a minor, were listed as plaintiffs. The defendants were Family Court, Westchester County; Judge Arlene (Gordon) Oliver; Eva Bunting Smith, Esq.; Arnold Szherzrniak; and Jasmine Hernandez, Esq. The judgment states that it was entered pursuant to an order issued on May 31, 2022, dismissing the complaint.

Disposition

The court dismissed K.M.D.’s claims without prejudice. It gave the stated reason that a non-attorney parent cannot bring claims on behalf of a minor child.

The court dismissed the remainder of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii), and cited Mills v. Fischer. The judgment does not explain the specific basis for each cited statutory provision or describe the underlying claims.

Appeal certification

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Judge

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.