Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

Dubose v. Jiminez

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:22-cv-02124
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Dubose v. Jiminez, Judge Briccetti denied Dubose’s request to serve discovery before defendants were served, finding the requests broad and the need unshown.

Who this affects

Tyrek Dubose’s request for early discovery was denied; the order concerned discovery directed to the defendants before service of process.

What happened

In Dubose v. Jiminez, Tyrek Dubose asked to serve discovery requests before the defendants had been served with legal papers.

The court denied the request because the proposed discovery was very broad, was not tailored to the claims in the complaint, and Dubose had not shown why discovery was needed at that stage.

Judge Briccetti also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dubose v. Jiminez · No. 7:22-cv-02124
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
May 31, 2022

Background

On May 25, 2022, the court received Tyrek Dubose’s motion for permission to serve discovery requests on the defendants before they had been served with legal process.

Court’s reasoning

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 generally requires parties to confer about discovery before seeking discovery from any source. Discovery cannot ordinarily begin before that conference unless the rules, the parties’ agreement, or a court order allows it.

The court declined to authorize early discovery at that stage. It found that Dubose’s proposed requests were very broad and not tailored to the claims in his complaint. The court also found that Dubose had not established a need for discovery at that point in the case.

Ruling and appeal status

The court denied Dubose’s motion. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and denied permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. The order was signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.