Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

Texiera v. Takara Belmont USA Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:21-cv-06085
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Texiera v. Takara Belmont, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the case after the parties settled, subject to a deadline for restoring it.

Who this affects

Olivia Texiera and Takara Belmont USA Inc.; the case was discontinued after the mediator reported that the parties had settled all issues.

What happened

Texiera v. Takara Belmont USA Inc. ended after the mediator informed the court that the parties had settled all issues.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party and allowed restoration to the court’s calendar if requested by July 1, 2022. If no request was made by then, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also adjourned all other dates and deadlines and directed the clerk to terminate the motion pending at docket entry 9.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Texiera v. Takara Belmont USA Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-06085
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
May 31, 2022

Background The mediator informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement resolving all issues in the case. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling The court ordered that the case be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application to restore the case was made by July 1, 2022. The court stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. It also adjourned all other dates and deadlines and requested that the clerk terminate the motion pending at docket entry 9.

Effect The order ended the case based on the reported settlement, while preserving the stated opportunity to request restoration by July 1, 2022. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.