Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

Yan Luis v. Marriott International, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-02713
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Kevin Yan Luis v. Marriott International, Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by July 1, 2022, or dismissal with prejudice afterward.

Who this affects

Kevin Yan Luis and Marriott International, Inc.; the action was discontinued without costs, subject to possible restoration by July 1, 2022, and otherwise dismissal with prejudice.

What happened

Kevin Yan Luis v. Marriott International, Inc. involved a letter telling the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and requested restoration by July 1, 2022. If no request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on May 31, 2022. The opinion does not decide the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Yan Luis v. Marriott International, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-02713
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
May 31, 2022

Background The court received a letter from Kevin Yan Luis stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Court’s Action The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. Restoration was available if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and made an application to restore the action by July 1, 2022. The order stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Result The action was discontinued based on the reported settlement in principle. The order did not address the merits of the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.