Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

Trividia Health, Inc. v. Nipro Corporation

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-08450
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
7
Fee PetitionArbitrationContract
In one sentence

In Trividia Health v. Nipro Corporation, Judge Caproni granted in part Trividia’s motion, awarding fees, costs, and interest after confirming an arbitration award.

Who this affects

Trividia Health, Inc. received an award of attorney’s fees, costs, and interest from Nipro Corporation after the court confirmed the arbitration award.

What happened

Trividia Health, Inc. v. Nipro Corporation followed a court order confirming an arbitration award that found Nipro had breached an agreement and awarded Trividia $21,668,302.30 in damages and legal costs. Trividia then asked for fees and costs from the confirmation proceeding and for interest.

Trividia relied on a contract provision allowing the prevailing party in an action, arbitration, proceeding, hearing, or motion to enforce the agreement to recover reasonable fees, costs, and expenses. Nipro disputed that the provision covered the court proceeding and argued that the requested fees were excessive. Nipro did not dispute that Trividia could receive post-judgment interest but opposed the requested rate for earlier interest.

Judge Valerie Caproni granted in part Trividia’s motion. The court awarded $163,586.06 in fees and costs, post-award and pre-judgment interest at 9 percent per year, and post-judgment interest at the federal rate specified by law.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trividia Health, Inc. v. Nipro Corporation · No. 1:20-cv-08450
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
May 31, 2022

Background

An arbitration proceeding lasting three years resulted in a September 18, 2020 final award by an International Chamber of Commerce tribunal. The tribunal determined that Nipro Corporation had breached an agreement with Trividia Health, Inc. and awarded Trividia $21,668,302.30 in damages and legal costs, including interest that had accrued. Trividia moved to confirm the non-domestic arbitration award, and the court granted that motion on December 10, 2021.

Trividia then moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2) for attorney’s fees, costs, and interest connected to confirming the arbitration award. It sought roughly $225,000 in fees and costs, post-award, pre-judgment interest at New York’s 9-percent annual rate, and post-judgment interest at the federal statutory rate. Nipro opposed the motion except as to post-judgment interest.

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

The parties’ International Distribution Agreement stated that when a party brought a legal action, arbitration, proceeding, hearing, or motion to enforce the agreement, the prevailing party could receive reasonable attorney’s fees, paralegal fees, costs, and expenses. Nipro argued that this provision covered only the arbitration, not the later court proceeding to confirm the award.

The court rejected that argument. It held that enforcing the agreement included confirming an arbitration award resulting from a party’s failure to comply with the agreement. The court therefore concluded that Trividia was entitled to attorney’s fees and expenses for the confirmation proceeding.

The court found Trividia’s lawyers’ hourly rates reasonable, but found that the overall number of hours billed was excessive. It reduced the hours attributed to each person on the invoices by 25 percent, resulting in $163,164.75 in fees. The court also excluded Westlaw charges as law-firm overhead and awarded $421.31 in other costs. The total award for fees and costs was $163,586.06.

Post-Award, Pre-Judgment Interest

The court determined that an award of interest for the period after the arbitration award but before judgment was appropriate. It selected New York’s 9-percent annual rate, citing the preference for that rate in the federal appeals circuit covering the court, Nipro’s refusal to accept the final award, and what the court described as Nipro’s continued delay.

Post-Judgment Interest

The court awarded post-judgment interest from the date of judgment until Nipro satisfies the judgment. It used the federal rate required by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a), which is based on the weekly average one-year constant-maturity Treasury yield for the calendar week before the judgment date.

Disposition

The court granted in part Trividia’s motion. It awarded Trividia $163,586.06 in attorney’s fees and costs, post-award, pre-judgment interest at 9 percent per year, and post-judgment interest at the federal rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). The Clerk of Court was directed to close the motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 7-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.