Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

Perez v. Deprospo

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-02866
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Perez v. Deprospo, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint at screening as seeking immune relief, frivolous, and failing to state a claim.

Who this affects

Antonio Molina Perez’s complaint was dismissed; the judgment also affects the defendants named in the complaint because it provides that the claims against them will not proceed.

What happened

In Perez v. Deprospo, the court entered judgment dismissing Antonio Molina Perez’s complaint against William L. Deprospo and other defendants.

The judgment says the complaint sought relief from defendants who were legally protected from that relief. It also says the complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim that could support relief. The opinion does not provide further details about the claims or the defendants’ conduct.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the dismissal on May 31, 2022. She also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez v. Deprospo · No. 1:22-cv-02866
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 31, 2022

Background

The court entered a civil judgment pursuant to its May 31, 2022 order dismissing the complaint. The judgment does not describe the underlying allegations or identify the specific relief sought.

Reasons for dismissal

The court dismissed the complaint under the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). It stated that the complaint sought relief against defendants who were immune from that relief, requiring dismissal under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii). The court consequently also characterized the complaint as frivolous under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

The court separately dismissed the complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) because it failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted.

Disposition

The court dismissed the complaint. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.