Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 1, 2022

Ray v. United States Postal Service

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:19-cv-06546
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
EmploymentFlsaCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Ray v. United States Postal Service, Judge Swain approved an $18,000 FLSA settlement and dismissed Ray’s claims with prejudice.

Who this affects

Michael Ray and the United States Postal Service; the settlement also addressed attorney’s fees payable to the Law Office of Rudy A. Dermesropian, LLC.

What happened

In Ray v. United States Postal Service, Michael Ray brought claims against the United States Postal Service under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties agreed to settle the action, and the settlement did not admit fault or liability by either side.

The Postal Service agreed to pay $18,000: $10,000 to Ray for alleged lost wages and an equal amount of liquidated damages, and $8,000 to his law firm for attorney’s fees. Ray agreed to release the Government from claims arising from the events in the case. The court dismissed Ray’s claims with prejudice and closed the case.

Judge Laura Swain found that the settlement, including the attorney-fee award, was fair and reasonable under the standards applied to Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. The court retained jurisdiction over disputes concerning payment of the settlement amount.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ray v. United States Postal Service · No. 1:19-cv-06546
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 1, 2022

Background

Michael Ray sued the United States Postal Service over alleged damages arising from claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the federal law governing certain wage and overtime rights. The parties submitted a proposed settlement and dismissal agreement.

Settlement Terms

The Postal Service agreed to pay a total of $18,000. One $10,000 check was to be paid to Ray, consisting of $5,000 for alleged lost wages and $5,000 in liquidated damages under 29 U.S.C. § 260. A second $8,000 check was to be paid to the Law Office of Rudy A. Dermesropian, LLC, for attorney’s fees.

Ray agreed to accept the settlement in full resolution of claims arising from the facts and circumstances of the action. He released and discharged the Government—including the Postal Service and specified federal entities and personnel—from those claims and agreed not to bring another lawsuit or administrative proceeding concerning matters covered by the release. The agreement stated that it was not an admission of fault or liability by either side and included costs, interest, attorney’s fees, and other litigation expenses in the settlement. The court retained jurisdiction over disputes concerning the settlement payment.

Court’s Ruling

After considering the parties’ submissions and the factors identified in Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., the court found that the proposed settlement and attorney-fee component were fair and reasonable and satisfied the requirements of Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The judgment dismissed Ray’s claims against the Postal Service with prejudice, without costs, expenses, or fees to either party except as provided in the settlement. The case was closed.

Classification

This is a procedural order because the case ended through an approved settlement and dismissal rather than a decision on the underlying FLSA claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.