Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Affilated FM Insurance Company

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-05433
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Jordache v. Affiliated, Judge Abrams closed the settled case, discontinuing it without costs and allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

Jordache Enterprises, Inc., the other plaintiffs identified in the action, and Affiliated FM Insurance Company.

What happened

Jordache Enterprises, Inc. and Affiliated FM Insurance Company reached a settlement while the case was pending in the Southern District of New York.

The parties asked to adjourn a scheduled status conference while they prepared settlement documents. The court discontinued the action without costs and allowed either party to seek restoration of the case within 30 days.

Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The order did not decide the underlying insurance dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Affilated FM Insurance Company · No. 1:21-cv-05433
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
May 31, 2022

Background

The plaintiffs, identified in the letter as Jordache Enterprises, Inc. and others, reported that the parties had reached a settlement and were preparing settlement documents. The letter also requested an adjournment of a status conference scheduled for June 2, 2022. The opinion text is partially garbled, but it clearly states the court’s disposition.

Ruling

The court discontinued the action without costs and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if a request to restore the action was made within 30 days. Any application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The order also stated that any request for the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement would require placing the settlement terms on the public record and having them approved by the court within the same 30-day period.

The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case. The court did not decide the merits of the underlying dispute or state the terms of the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.