Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 3, 2022

Jones v. County of Westchester

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:14-cv-07635-NSR
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFamily
In one sentence

In Jones v. County of Westchester, Judge Roman granted defendants’ request to seal certain exhibits concerning private child-welfare, education, and family records.

Who this affects

Defendants may file certain exhibits under seal, while plaintiff D.J. and third parties receive protection for private medical, family, child-welfare, education, and Family Court information.

What happened

In Jones v. County of Westchester, defendants asked to file certain exhibits supporting their upcoming summary-judgment motion under seal, meaning the exhibits would not be publicly accessible. The plaintiff, through counsel, consented to the request.

The exhibits concerned records from the Westchester County Department of Social Services, education records, and Family Court records. They included medical, family, and educational information about plaintiff D.J. and other people, including some minors.

Judge Nelson S. Roman granted defendants’ request to seal certain exhibits and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the sealing motion. The order did not decide the parties’ underlying claims or the pending summary-judgment motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jones v. County of Westchester · No. 7:14-cv-07635-NSR
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
June 3, 2022

Background

Defendants requested permission to file certain exhibits supporting their forthcoming motion for summary judgment under seal. Filing documents under seal restricts public access to them. The plaintiff, through counsel, consented to the request.

The case involves claims that plaintiff D.J. was deprived of an education while in the care and custody of the Westchester County Department of Social Services. The requested exhibits fell into three categories: Department of Social Services records, educational records, and Family Court records.

Reasoning in the Request

The request stated that these records are generally confidential under applicable law. It identified information about D.J.’s diagnoses, medications, treatment observations, family relationships, foster families, and educational evaluations concerning her mental and physical capacity and needs. The request also cited privacy interests belonging to D.J. and third parties, including siblings who were still minors.

The request relied on the principle that courts should consider whether the information is traditionally private rather than public. It cited authorities concerning the confidentiality of child-welfare records, Family Court records, and education records.

Ruling

The court granted defendants’ request to seal certain exhibits. Judge Roman directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion at ECF No. 231. The order addressed access to the exhibits only; it did not rule on the merits of the claims or on defendants’ anticipated motion for summary judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.