Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 6, 2022

Williams, Jr. v. City of New York

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:22-cv-03819
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeDiscovery
In one sentence

In Williams, Jr. v. City of New York, Judge Gardephe ordered service and discovery steps in Alexander Williams Jr.’s civil-rights case.

Who this affects

Alexander Williams Jr. and the City of New York, ADW Green, Captain Islam, DW Shivraj, DW Morales, CO Coxson, CO Kevin Young, and CO Ritter; the order also directs notifications to the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department.

What happened

In Williams, Jr. v. City of New York, Alexander Williams Jr. brought a civil-rights lawsuit without a lawyer under a federal law allowing claims against government officials for violating rights.

The court had already allowed Williams to proceed without paying court fees upfront. It directed the clerk to notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department, and it asked the defendants to waive formal service of the lawsuit.

Judge Gardephe ruled that a local discovery rule applies. The defendants must answer specified discovery requests within 120 days after receiving the complaint. The court also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams, Jr. v. City of New York · No. 1:22-cv-03819
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
June 6, 2022

Background

Alexander Williams Jr., who was incarcerated at the George R. Vierno Center on Rikers Island, filed this lawsuit without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that the City of New York and ADW Green, Captain Islam, DW Shivraj, DW Morales, CO Coxson, CO Kevin Young, and CO Ritter violated his rights. The opinion does not describe the underlying alleged violations.

By an earlier order dated June 1, 2022, the court allowed Williams to proceed without prepaying filing fees. The court noted that prisoners must still pay the full filing fee over time under the applicable statute, even when granted that status.

Service and Discovery

The court directed the clerk to notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department of the order. It requested that the City of New York, ADW Green, Captain Islam, DW Shivraj, DW Morales, CO Coxson, CO Kevin Young, and CO Ritter waive service of summons.

The court ruled that Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies. That rule requires defendants in certain prisoner cases to respond to specified, court-ordered discovery requests. The defendants must serve responses to the standard interrogatories and document requests within 120 days after service of the complaint, and their responses must quote each request word for word. The court stated that Williams may request paper copies of the discovery requests from the Pro Se Intake Unit if he cannot access them online.

Disposition

Judge Paul G. Gardephe concluded that Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies to the action and requested that the defendants waive service. The court did not decide the merits of Williams’s civil-rights claims in this order. It certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal from this order. The clerk was also directed to mail Williams an information package.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.