Dominguez v. Hallmark Retail, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:19-cv-11165
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Dominguez v. Hallmark, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of standing and allowed an amended complaint.
Yovanny Dominguez and the other people he sought to represent; Hallmark Retail, LLC remains the defendant.
What happened
Yovanny Dominguez sued Hallmark Retail, LLC under federal, state, and city disability-discrimination laws, alleging that Hallmark did not carry braille gift cards. He brought the case for himself and other similarly situated people.
The court said Dominguez’s amended complaint was substantially identical to complaints that the Second Circuit had found insufficient to establish standing. The court therefore concluded that it lacked authority to hear the case.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of standing. Dominguez may file a second amended complaint within 15 days; if he does not do so on time, the case will be dismissed with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Dominguez v. Hallmark Retail, LLC · No. 1:19-cv-11165
- Vyskocil
- June 7, 2022
Background
Yovanny Dominguez sued Hallmark Retail, LLC, individually and on behalf of himself and other similarly situated people. The complaint asserted claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. The opinion states that Dominguez and other visually impaired plaintiffs had filed substantially identical cases against stores and restaurants alleging that they did not carry braille gift cards.
Hallmark filed a motion seeking dismissal for lack of standing and failure to state a claim. The court administratively terminated that motion and stayed the case while an appeal involving five similar cases was resolved.
Court’s Reasoning
The Second Circuit later affirmed the dismissals in the related cases, explaining that conclusory and boilerplate allegations in nearly identical complaints did not establish standing. The district court determined that Dominguez’s first amended complaint was substantially identical to those complaints.
Standing is the requirement that a plaintiff show a sufficient connection to the dispute to invoke the court’s authority. The court stated that it had an independent duty to examine its subject-matter jurisdiction and to dismiss when that jurisdiction was lacking. Based on the absence of standing, the court did not reach the underlying disability-discrimination claims.
Disposition
The court ordered that the case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of standing. Dominguez may file a second amended complaint within 15 days. The order states that if he does not timely file one, the case will be dismissed with prejudice.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.