Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 8, 2022

Tung v. Jade Spoon Asian Cuisine Inc.

Judge
Andrew Krause
Docket
7:21-cv-10651
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Tung v. Jade Spoon, Judge Krause approved the parties’ modified settlement as fair and reasonable and directed that the case be closed.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendants who entered into the modified settlement agreement; the case was directed to be closed.

What happened

In Tung v. Jade Spoon Asian Cuisine Inc., the parties submitted a modified settlement agreement after the court identified issues with an earlier proposal.

The court found that the modified agreement properly addressed those issues and approved it as fair and reasonable. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms or the underlying claims.

Judge Andrew E. Krause stated that a stipulation dismissing the case with prejudice would be docketed separately and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tung v. Jade Spoon Asian Cuisine Inc. · No. 7:21-cv-10651
Judge
Andrew Krause
Date
June 8, 2022

Background

The parties submitted a modified proposed settlement agreement. The court stated that the modified agreement properly addressed all issues identified in its May 3, 2022 Decision and Order.

Ruling

The court approved the modified settlement agreement as fair and reasonable under the standards identified in the opinion and in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or decide the underlying claims.

Disposition

The court stated that an endorsed stipulation and order dismissing the case with prejudice would be docketed separately. It also directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.