Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 9, 2022

Tucker v. City of New York

Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Docket
1:18-cv-10531
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Tucker v. City of New York, Judge Hellerstein dismissed the case for failure to prosecute after Tucker took no further action for more than three years.

Who this affects

Douglas Tucker and the defendants, including the City of New York. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

What happened

In Tucker v. City of New York, the court said Plaintiff’s counsel was allowed to withdraw on May 23, 2019. The court also stayed the case for 60 days so Tucker could try to find new counsel.

More than three years later, Tucker had not retained new counsel or filed anything further in the case. The court therefore dismissed the case for failure to prosecute, meaning the plaintiff did not move the case forward.

Judge Hellerstein found that dismissal was warranted after considering the required factors. He directed the Clerk to mark the case closed. The order did not state whether the dismissal permits refiling.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tucker v. City of New York · No. 1:18-cv-10531
Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Date
June 9, 2022

Background

On May 23, 2019, the court granted Plaintiff’s counsel permission to withdraw. The court also granted Tucker’s request to stay the case for 60 days to give him an opportunity to retain new counsel.

Court’s Analysis

The court stated that more than three years had passed since that order. During that time, Tucker had neither retained new counsel nor filed anything on the docket to advance the case. The court applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), which allows a case to be dismissed when a plaintiff fails to prosecute, or move the case forward. The court also considered the factors identified in Shannon v. GE Co. and found that dismissal was warranted.

Disposition

Judge Hellerstein dismissed the case for failure to prosecute. The Clerk was directed to mark the case closed. The order did not specify whether the dismissal permits refiling.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.