Paguada v. Superlogics Incorporated
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-01831
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Paguada v. Superlogics, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by July 11, 2022.
Dilenia Paguada and Superlogics Incorporated; the action was discontinued without costs, subject to restoration by July 11, 2022, and otherwise dismissal with prejudice.
What happened
In Paguada v. Superlogics Incorporated, the plaintiff told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
The court ordered the action discontinued without costs to either party. The case could be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, but the request had to be made by July 11, 2022.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no request to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Paguada v. Superlogics Incorporated · No. 1:22-cv-01831
- Vyskocil
- June 10, 2022
Background
Plaintiff Dilenia Paguada filed a letter informing the Court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not state the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The Court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by July 11, 2022. The Court further ordered that, if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.