Red Mountain Medical Holdings, Inc. v. Brill, M.D.
- Naomi Buchwald
- 1:20-cv-02652
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Red Mountain Medical Holdings v. Brill, Judge Buchwald granted a limited request to seal exhibits from a premotion letter.
Red Mountain Medical Holdings, Inc., the defendants, and third parties whose documents or deposition testimony appeared in the exhibits.
What happened
Red Mountain Medical Holdings, Inc. v. Brill, M.D. involved a request concerning exhibits attached to the company’s opposition to defendants’ request to file a summary-judgment motion.
The company asked the court to seal Exhibits 1 through 29 because they contained documents and deposition excerpts designated confidential under a protective order. It said redacting the materials would be impractical and wanted to protect information produced by parties and third parties.
Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald granted the sealing request, but only for the limited purpose of the premotion letter referenced in the request. The order did not decide the parties’ underlying dispute.
The detailed version
- Red Mountain Medical Holdings, Inc. v. Brill, M.D. · No. 1:20-cv-02652
- Naomi Buchwald
- June 13, 2022
Background
Red Mountain Medical Holdings, Inc., formerly known as CDx Diagnostics, Inc., wrote to the court regarding exhibits attached to its opposition to defendants’ request for permission to file a summary-judgment motion. The exhibits included documents produced by parties and a third party, as well as excerpts from deposition transcripts. The materials had been designated confidential in the case.
A stipulated protective order allowed a party to request that confidential material be filed under seal when redacting only the confidential portions would be significantly impractical and likely unduly burdensome for the court. Red Mountain said the entire documents and deposition transcripts had been designated confidential and that redactions therefore would be impractical. It also stated that it did not believe the materials met the usual standard for sealing but wanted to comply with the protective order and protect third parties that had produced documents under its terms.
Request
Red Mountain asked the court to seal Exhibits 1 through 29 during the case or until the court determined that sealing was no longer necessary. It stated that the court’s electronic filing help desk had placed the exhibits under seal on an emergency basis.
Ruling
Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald granted the request to seal for the limited purpose of the premotion letter referenced in the request. The order did not address the merits of the underlying dispute or decide whether the defendants should be allowed to file a summary-judgment motion.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.