Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 14, 2022

Labossiere v. Downstate Correctional Facility

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:21-cv-10538
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Labossiere v. Downstate Correctional Facility, Judge Karas ordered New York’s Attorney General to provide Baxter’s service address within 60 days.

Who this affects

Wilfred Labossiere, N. Baxter, the New York Attorney General, the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Labossiere v. Downstate Correctional Facility, Wilfred Labossiere, who is representing himself, sued under a federal civil-rights law over alleged violations during his incarceration at Downstate Correctional Facility.

The U.S. Marshals Service could not serve N. Baxter because Downstate had closed. The court therefore directed the New York Attorney General, as counsel for and agent of the state corrections department, to provide Baxter’s address to the court and Labossiere within 60 days.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas ordered the Clerk of Court to send the order and complaint to the Attorney General and a copy of the order to Labossiere. The court did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Labossiere v. Downstate Correctional Facility · No. 7:21-cv-10538
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
June 14, 2022

Background

Wilfred Labossiere, who is incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility and is proceeding without a lawyer, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that the defendants violated his rights while he was incarcerated at Downstate Correctional Facility. The named defendants include Downstate, John Doe, identified as an officer assigned to a particular block and shift, and N. Baxter.

Service problem

On February 24, 2022, the court directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Baxter at Downstate. On May 23, 2022, the Marshals Service returned the service paperwork unexecuted because Downstate had closed.

Court’s action

The court relied on Valentin v. Dinkins, which provides that a person representing himself is entitled to the district court’s assistance in identifying an unidentified defendant. Because Baxter is an employee of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, the court directed the New York Attorney General, which the opinion identifies as the department’s attorney and agent, to provide an address where Baxter can be served within 60 days of the order. If Baxter is a former employee or official, the Attorney General must provide a residential address where Baxter can be served.

After receiving the information, the court stated that it would direct the Clerk to complete the service form with Baxter’s address and provide the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail the order and complaint to the Attorney General and a copy of the order to Labossiere. The order addressed service of process and did not decide the merits of Labossiere’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.