Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 15, 2022

A.M. v. New York City Department of Education

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-06665
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In A.M. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration requests within 30 days.

Who this affects

A.M., M.M., and the New York City Department of Education; the action was closed after the court was informed that the parties had settled.

What happened

A.M., individually and on behalf of M.M., a child with a disability, sued the New York City Department of Education. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement terms.

The court was informed that the case had settled. It therefore discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application was made within 30 days.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. Any request to reopen filed after 30 days may be denied solely because it was late; the court would retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement only if the agreement’s terms were placed on the public record and approved by the court within that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
A.M. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:21-cv-06665
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
June 15, 2022

Background

A.M. brought the action individually and on behalf of M.M., a child with a disability, against the New York City Department of Education. The order does not identify the claims or provide the terms of the settlement.

Court’s Action

The court stated that it had been informed that the case had settled. It ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days.

The court stated that an application to reopen filed after 30 days could be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.