Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2022

Mejia v. Real Ketones, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-02813
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mejia v. Real Ketones, LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after the parties reported a settlement in principle, subject to a July 18 deadline.

Who this affects

Jose Mejia and Real Ketones, LLC; the action was discontinued based on the parties' reported settlement in principle.

What happened

In Mejia v. Real Ketones, LLC, Plaintiff Jose Mejia told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. It allowed either party to seek restoration of the case if the settlement could not be put in writing, but the request had to be made by July 18, 2022.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no request to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be reopened.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mejia v. Real Ketones, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-02813
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
June 16, 2022

Background Plaintiff Jose Mejia filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement's terms.

Court's Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court's calendar if the parties could not memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by July 18, 2022. The court further stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Result Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on June 16, 2022. The opinion did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.