Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2022

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Genrus Corp.

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:22-cv-04886
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureArbitration
In one sentence

In Trustees v. Genrus, Judge Cronan set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The order affected the petitioners, who had to submit additional materials and serve Genrus Corp., and Genrus Corp., which was given deadlines to oppose the petition.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Genrus Corp., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. They filed the petition on June 10, 2022.

The court treated the confirmation proceedings like a motion for summary judgment and ordered the petitioners to submit any additional supporting materials by June 30, 2022. Genrus Corp.’s opposition, if any, was due July 14, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due July 21.

Judge John P. Cronan also ordered the petitioners to serve Genrus Corp. with the petition, supporting papers, and the order by June 22, and to file proof of service by June 24. The order set procedures and deadlines but did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:22-cv-04886
Judge
John Cronan
Date
June 16, 2022

Background

On June 10, 2022, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment, which is a procedure for deciding whether the available record requires judgment for one side.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by June 30, 2022. Genrus Corp.’s opposition, if any, was due July 14, 2022, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due July 21, 2022.

The court also ordered the petitioners to serve Genrus Corp. electronically and by overnight mail with the petition, all supporting papers, and the order no later than June 22, 2022. The petitioners had to file an affidavit confirming that service by June 24, 2022.

Disposition

The court entered an order setting briefing and service deadlines. The opinion does not state that the court decided whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.