Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 21, 2022

Abreu v. Tour Edge Golf Manufacturing, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-03684
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

Abreu v. Tour Edge Golf Manufacturing, Inc.: Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by July 22, 2022.

Who this affects

Luigi Abreu and Tour Edge Golf Manufacturing, Inc.; the case was discontinued under the stated settlement-related conditions.

What happened

In Abreu v. Tour Edge Golf Manufacturing, Inc., Luigi Abreu told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party. The case could be restored to the court’s calendar if an application was made by July 22, 2022; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Abreu v. Tour Edge Golf Manufacturing, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-03684
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
June 21, 2022

Background

Luigi Abreu sued Tour Edge Golf Manufacturing, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The court received a letter from Abreu stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms or the underlying claims.

Order

The court ordered that the case be discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring the case to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by July 22, 2022. The court stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.

Disposition

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal based on the reported settlement in principle. The order did not decide the merits of the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.