Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 22, 2022

Ingram IV v. Cuomo

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:22-cv-05067
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Ingram IV v. Cuomo: Judge Ramos ordered the plaintiff to pay $402 or submit a fee-waiver application within 30 days, or the case will be dismissed.

Who this affects

The plaintiff, who must either pay $402 or submit a completed fee-waiver application within 30 days for the new civil action to proceed. The defendants were not required to respond at this stage, and no summons issued.

What happened

In Ingram IV v. Cuomo, the court reopened the plaintiff’s previously filed miscellaneous action as a new civil case. The plaintiff had paid a $49 fee but had not paid the required civil-case fees or submitted an application to proceed without prepaying them.

The court ordered the Clerk of Court to refund the $49 payment. It gave the plaintiff 30 days to either pay the total $402 in filing and administrative fees or complete, sign, and submit the attached application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Judge Edgardo Ramos also ordered that no summons issue yet and said the case would be processed if the plaintiff complied. If the plaintiff did not comply within 30 days, the new civil action would be dismissed; the court also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ingram IV v. Cuomo · No. 1:22-cv-05067
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
June 22, 2022

Background

The plaintiff originally filed the matter as a miscellaneous action and paid a $49 filing fee. In an earlier order, the court directed the Clerk of Court to administratively close that miscellaneous action and reopen it as a new civil action assigned to Judge Ramos. The opinion states that the new action was assigned docket number 1:22-CV-5067 (ER).

The plaintiff was proceeding without a lawyer. To proceed with a civil action, the plaintiff had to pay $402— consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submit a completed and signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. The plaintiff had done neither: only the $49 miscellaneous-action fee had been paid, and no fee-waiver application had been submitted.

Court’s Orders

The court directed the Clerk of Court to refund the $49 fee paid in the miscellaneous action and to send the plaintiff a copy of the order. It ordered the plaintiff, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the full $402 or complete, sign, and submit the attached application to proceed without prepaying fees, identifying docket number 1:22-CV-5067 (ER). If the court later granted that application, the plaintiff could proceed in the new civil action without paying the fees in advance.

The court ordered that no summons issue at that time. It stated that the new civil action would be processed under the Clerk of Court’s procedures if the plaintiff complied. If the plaintiff failed to comply within the allowed time, the new civil action would be dismissed. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied authorization to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

Effect of the Order

This order addressed filing-fee requirements and the case’s administrative processing; it did not decide the plaintiff’s underlying claims against the defendants. The order was signed by Edgardo Ramos, United States District Judge, on June 22, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.